The Fake Birth Certificate Argument

The Fake Birth Certificate Argument

I once told a government official that the birth certificate was a fraudulent contract that was entered into by third party intervenors without my knowledge or consent and before I was of a legal age to enter a contract. I was asked if I was calling my parents third parties. The answer of course is yes but that is only partly true. I was referring to all the other parties on the document.

The law is very clear about who can and who cannot enter a contract. Yes there is a contract but I am the only one named on the document who is not a party to it. End of story. I am the real third party in fact. In fact it shows that my parents were duped by some pretty slick salesman. They knew that they couldn’t enter into a contract with me but by the same law my parents were also forbidden. So what does this have to do with me. Nothing. If that contract was even legal, it expired when I came of age.

So where is my new offer that I can now legally negotiate on my own terms? That’s when the slick salesmen show up again and insist that I must use this worthless expired document to create even more dubious documents. All these contracts are one sided. That is the terms are dictated not negotiated. Unilateral not bilateral in legal terms. It is based on the assumption that I am obligated to honour a fraudulent contract that I am not a party to. I am only using simple logic so a layman can understand. I am only a layman.

You are actually being denied the right to freely contract and this right has been stolen by thieves. You are only allowed to do business on their terms. But not to worry. I say they have given us a gift if we know how to accept it correctly without being obligated. There is no need to deny any of their documents if you know where your true legal position is. You are now the parent and the documents are the wayward children. They can’t keep themselves out of trouble because they are all frauds and forgeries.

Remember they are holding you to something that happened when you were about two days old. The truth is your documents are chronic gamblers. Every time you create a document to be issued you are a creator not the thing itself. There are so many liabilities involved that a bond has to be created also to indemnify all of the parties involved. You didn’t know about this other creation that you authorised. This document itself is a financial instrument. It is in fact legally defined in the Criminal Code as a credit card. That is the real reason they want your papers. They are trying to get at these accounts in the background and they are actually committing credit card fraud. Its a shell game.

Let’s think of our documents now as our adult children. They are charging our children for our debts and vice versa. What we should be saying so to speak is I am not paying his debts and am not going to let him pay mine. Even though they may have your physical body this is what is happening. Let us take a credit card break for a minute as I am going to assume that you haven’t looked at the Criminal Code yet for a definition. Where I live our driver’s licence and health cards are issued at the same office, Service Ontario. A health card is a credit card. When you present it for healthcare the bill is magically paid. You have no idea what charges were made or how they were paid. This makes Service Ontario a financial institution. That is why they place charges against your driver’s licence but accusations against you. Remember the shell game and keep your eye on the sleight of hand.

You are creating everything here and they are going on a spending spree with your credit cards. The game is rigged. They don’t care what you did it’s just an excuse to rob you. The goal is for them to make you feel guilty for the non crime you are being accused of and you are sobbing and pleading with them because you don’t realise you are just a mark. If you can learn how to deny the legal name, because the legal name is your bastard child who has been following you around since birth like a bad smell. Go see the shyster salesmen who sold him to me and let them change his diapers. It’s that simple.

You are basically looking at their phony charges and saying yes I may have ran that red light but someone else racked up the charges. You have caught them at their shell game. Its all about shuffling the true identities of all the parties. Its like getting stuck with the bar bill because all the seats were taken when the music stopped. Learn how to sit back and observe what’s going on from the DJ’s seat.

Your legal name is your agent in commerce and not you. Let’s go back to the birth certificate and take another look at it. There is not a single thing on there that you can verify. You may disagree but I am talking about the legal requirements. All you know for sure is that you came from somewhere. They know even less than you. You probably have some hearsay evidence about some of the claims made on it but hearsay is not admissible. Really you know nothing for sure. They might trick you for example by asking your date of birth. You weren’t there in a legal sense so how would you know. Are you going to trust that slick salesman. Is he still around so we can ask him. They will ask where you were born. Same answer.

By this time they may say well where do you come from then. That’s when I tell them that as far as I can tell, my father’s penis. OK you didn’t see that one coming. It may sound crude but you need to have a different mindset to counter their logic. Keep your eye on the shell game. The whole point of this exercise is to understand the legal sleight of hand. Everything that you sign for with them is under penalty of perjury. You can legally show at least in your understanding that by swearing to that birth certificate is perjury in fact. You were not old enough to be a credible witness. You don’t have to tell them any of this of course. You just need to know your position has a firm legal and unassailable footing.

You see the legal name is really an agent in commerce which is a legal fiction. He’s more like a double agent. Or multiple agent because he has a lot of affiliations. He has been impersonating you and you have been duped into impersonating him. By denying the name you are not denying who you are. They have to make you believe you are him for the shell game to work. You are not going to have any fancy arguments with them. For ways that I use this knowledge, you will have to read my other blogs. I never argue or negotiate with them. I simply let them know that I am not the party they are looking for. They don’t like this because you have rendered them powerless and their entire army of slick salesman have lost their payday. It is an immediate counterattack and all you need in most cases is a pen and stamps. The reason it stops them is because they are only authorised to deal with fictions. You are in turn letting them know that you have no authority to deal in a fictional world. Only man to man in a private capacity.

I have seen too many people try to bring complicated arguments. It is not necessary. I like to think of the way I deal with them as the caveman approach. I go in there with a club and give them one big legal whack on the head and leave. Sometimes thrown out but they always abandon their claim. It is very easy and anyone can do this. You don’t have to have a gift of the gab because you are saying nothing. I don’t need any papers because I am only there to deny the name. The shell game requires you to identity yourself and you have unwittingly been telling them the bastard child’s name. You will never have to answer to the charges once the proper identities have been established.

Notice the deception in how they ask for the name. They don’t ask who you are. Can you state your name for the record or similar is what they say. Whenever the word “you” or “your” is used they are using the plural context as in you all. They are also using the Latin trick of idem sonans which means sounds alike. They are using words and names and phrases which mean something different when used in a legal setting as to how we use the same words in everyday language. Once you see through the trick questions it is very easy to see how we have been fooled. You are for example giving them a name that sounds like the name they are looking for. They know this name is fictitious. They are hoping you don’t.

What would happen if you answered no I cannot state my name for the record. They cannot proceed until you agree to be a party to the dispute. You might be thinking how can I deny this. Everybody knows who I am. No they don’t. They know who your legal name is. That’s all. What if you asked them is that a trick question when asked for your name. If you watch court drama you will see that every defendant falls for the name question. It is so ingrained in us that we must blurt this name out whenever asked that few people ask themselves what is going on. They are beating us up through the name. The name is like an ankle bracelet if you don’t know how to shake it off. It’s that simple. When you take the name away from them it takes the stick out of their hand. They are beating in the wind.

Can you be charged for denying the name. No you are not committing a crime. It is crime prevention. It it a violation of the Criminal Code to use a fictitious name. Section 403 identity fraud. They are attempting to pre criminalise the situation. You have already lost before the charges are even discussed just because you committed identity fraud by giving the false name. You have also been tricked into an oath and have granted them jurisdiction to punish you whatever chances you think you have of disputing the charges. You have walked right into a spanking. Once you give the name you have granted access to the account. It’s now more like a case of convincing a car rental company to reverse some of their charges.

They are the ones who are now exposed as the true criminals when you deny the name. For more on this read my other blogs. That is the real reason they will abandon their claim because they have been caught attempting to commit fraud. You have the higher legal and moral ground and they don’t like it. Don’t ever get into a discussion with them about the birth certificate or any of that nonsense. You throw around sections of the Criminal Code if you are in a tight spot. Are you asking me to commit identity fraud in violation of section 403 you could ask. Is that an incitement to commit perjury in violation of section 137 you could ask the judge. This is in fact exactly what he is doing when he demands the name. You give the name you have committed perjury and he has incited you to do so. Are you asking me to acknowledge an instrument in a false name in violation of section 405.

Remember these are real crimes he is inciting you to commit and he knows it. You don’t need to be an expert in the Criminal Code. I usually shut them down with one section only. You don’t even need to quote numbers. I once had a department of the government that were not happy because they didn’t have photo ID on their records. They asked me if I could bring down some expired documents. I told them that would be credit card fraud. They immediately changed their mind and said what they had was good enough. You see all of their documents have expiry dates. So does your credit card. What happens if you use your bank credit card after it has expired. You are charged with using a cancelled credit card. But I thought it was expired you ask. Yes but as soon as it expires the bank cancels it. You will notice your driver’s licence also has an expiry date. When I had them pull up my expired driver’s licence to find out the status the transcript said it was cancelled. If you now look up credit card fraud in the Criminal Code, it says using a cancelled credit card. You see they wanted my old photo ID not for me to prove who I was. They wanted access to the accounts. They were literally asking for my bank card and password. Most people will not see this sleight of hand.

Even if you present a valid driver’s licence, they are still committing credit card fraud because you are in the dark about what is going on. They are not telling you and that is fraud by deception and omission. I said to a policeman as he was handing me a traffic ticket that I was noticing him for credit card fraud. He immediately denied it. I like to get something always from these people and now he is on the defensive. I didn’t argue with him. I told him to read his Criminal Code. Do you think that guy will ever show up at court now. I saved him the trouble anyway by rejecting his false claim for fraud. I write about how I do this in another post so I won’t get into that here only to say that all it costs are a few stamps.

Never feel helpless. Give them what they think they want and reject it later. If you get to know the Criminal Code you can stop a lot of problems by noticing them of what they are doing as they are doing it. Never accuse them. Just notice. Oh by the way officer, I noticed that you were attempting to compel me to give evidence against my self. You have the right against self incrimination and it is spelled out in the Criminal Code. Or how about you tell him after he accepts your papers that you are noticing him for acknowledging instrument in false name as of section 405 of the Criminal Code. See if he still wants to write the ticket. You don’t care either way.

If he now accuses you of giving him false ID tell him he had better write you up for that. Now he is going to want your real name. My friends call me Kevin. Where do you live? That’s private. What’s your D.O.B.? Don’t know. You see he has a dilemma now. He has already ran your I.D. and he knows all about you. He has got your picture in front of him but he also knows its not you. Legally speaking that is. You could ask him as you give him your papers, is it your intention to commit credit card fraud with that information? Anyway that is some examples of how you can diffuse a lot of situations.

Once you know who you really are in the equation and have studied some codes, you will find your own ways to be creative. Let him deny or non respond to your notices. You don’t want to debate him anyway. They know the Criminal Code very well and see it as a one way tool. It isn’t. Everything they do is in violation of the code so never second guess yourself. He can say whatever he wants at the stop. He now knows that he can never be put under oath in your case and risk being asked these questions. Whenever these kind of things happen in court the judge will shut it down by saying the officer was not a credible witness and dismiss. He won’t give a reason. You have lots of tools. For example threatening behaviour. They use this all the time. You can make them aware and issue a threat of legal repercussions. A threat of this kind is covered in the same section of the code. It is not a threat within the meaning of the Criminal Code. Have you ever heard of someone suing because they were threatened with a lawsuit.

So you have put some doubt in his mind and can avoid having to deal with their paper if he decides to move on. I have repelled many would be scammers just with knowledge of the Criminal Code. I chased away the census takers from my door never to return. I didn’t even debate. When he told me it was a criminal offence to not file I told him to leave. He was really accusing me of a pre-crime and wanted me to debate. There is nothing to debate if the crime is allegedly in the future. He got very angry and said he would be back. When he came back he wanted to know if I was refusing. I know that to be a trick question so I chased him again. No debate. I chased him to his car with a pen and paper and took his details. He was cooperative until I asked him if the car was registered in his name. He said it was none of my business. I told him don’t ask me any questions as it was none of his business. He never came back. Some of his colleagues did come however but he must have warned them because they all left without a fuss. A little secret they don’t want you to know is that census filing is not mentioned in the Criminal Code. Check for yourself.

I chased away FEDEX on the phone. They were trying to scam me for $20 they said I owed in customs duty. They were so cocky and sure that I had to pay and implied I was trying to deny an obligation. That’s when I said their claim was fraudulent. Now I had his attention. I explained it to him. He wasn’t cocky anymore and I never heard from them again.

Think of yourself as a pre crime crusader. You are always the intended victim and it always requires them to trick you into violating the Criminal Code. If you know how to stay in harmony it exposes their weakness. They have to break the law to do what they do.

In conclusion, too many people get confused about the legal name and want to convince the courts and police of its existence. There is no benefit to this and that is why I call it a fake argument. All arguments with them are fake. They want you to argue because you are the one who looks silly. My job is to make them look silly. Besides arguing is dishonour. Arguments create disputes and you are there to prevent a dispute. It is not a question of whether or not there is legal name fraud. The answer is indisputable. How can we rebut their assumptions is all we need to know. The answers are all in the Criminal Code. Read it and understand it for yourself. You will never fear these tyrant’s again. In fact they will fear you.